classic case with glass screen protector for apple iphone x and xs - navy

The new Quora iPhone app, version 3.0, is gesture-centric, meaning the application user can swipe back and forth to move among five different feeds of content. The application also comes with a navigation drawer, where people can find their notifications, messages, or draft entries. The drawer is accessible anywhere in the app by tapping the Quora logo. "The design of iOS 7 .. lets us create a fluid movement throughout the app," Marc Bodnick, who runs the company's business and community teams, told CNET. "iOS 7 puts content first to build an effortless, no-friction reading experience."The swiping structure, he said, is intended to expose people to more of Quora's expansive content library, which includes questions and answers, blogs, and reviews on more than 400,000 topics. Just how many people is anyone's guess. Quora has always been cagey about the size of its user base, leaving many to speculate, both on and off the question-and-answer site, about its traffic and overall health.

The company, which has raised $61 million to date, still refuses to provide concrete data on its traction, ComScore counted 1.84 million unique US visitors to Quora.com in August 2013, up more than 20 percent from the previous month, but down around 10 percent from last August when comScore measured more than 2 million unique US visitors, Bodnick said, however, that about one-third of Quora's audience is now on mobile, and the iPhone app's fresh face is part of a company-wide strategy to prioritize mobile over Web going forward, classic case with glass screen protector for apple iphone x and xs - navy The startup's mobile users spend double the number of hours using Quora as desktop-only users, he said..

Though surely part marketing ploy, Quora's iOS 7-optimized application looks invitingly touchable and may be timed at just the right moment to convince folks to give the app an initial spin or second look. If the company has made the app as reader-friendly as touted, those people will find themselves on a never-ending quest for knowledge. Quota said it eventually hopes to have parity between its iPhone and Android applications, and will improve the Android application over time. As part of a clever marketing ploy, the Q&A company has updated its iPhone app to be invitingly touchable and more reader-friendly.

"Because it is necessary to obtain the bulk collection of a telephone company's metadata to determine those connections between known and unknown international terrorist operatives as part of authorized investigations, the production of the information sought meets the standard for relevance under Section 215," Eagan wrote, In contrast classic case with glass screen protector for apple iphone x and xs - navy to the Stored Communications Act, which also allows the government access to records, Eagan writes that under Section 215 a request for non-content records "requires neither 'specific and articulable facts' nor does it require that the information be material, Rather it merely requires a statement of facts showing that there are reasonable grounds to believe that the records sought are relevant to the investigation."Noting that Congress removed the "specific and articulable facts" requirement, Eagan said the government need not "demonstrate any connection to a particular suspect, nor show materiality when requesting business records under Section 215, To find otherwise would be to impose a higher burden -- one that Congress knew how to include in Section 215, but chose to dispense with."The opinion also points out that Section 215 has a mechanism in place that allows recipients of orders to challenge them, but that none ever has..

"To this date, no holder of records who has received an Order to produce bulk telephony metadata has challenged the legality of such an Order," Eagan wrote in the ruling. "Indeed, no recipient of any Section 215 Order has challenged the legality of such an Order, despite the explicit statutory mechanism for doing so."The court also concluded that the agency's collection of phone data did not conflict with Americans' Fourth Amendment rights under the third-party doctrine in Smith v. Maryland, a 1979 Supreme Court decision that upheld the collection of electronic communications without a warrant.